Randomized trial of artesunate+ amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine+ amodiaquine, chlorproguanal-dapsone and SP for malaria in pregnancy in Tanzania.

dc.contributor.authorMutabingwa, Theonest K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-11T09:39:48Z
dc.date.available2020-03-11T09:39:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractBackground: Malaria in pregnancy is serious, and drug resistance in Africa is spreading. Drugs have greater risks in pregnancy and determining the safety and efficacy of drugs in pregnancy is therefore a priority. This study set out to determine the efficacy and safety of several antimalarial drugs and combinations in pregnant women with uncomplicated malaria. Methods: Pregnant women with non-severe, slide proven, falciparum malaria were randomised to one of 4 regimes: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine [SP]; chlorproguanil-dapsone [CD]; SP+amodiaquine [SP+AQ] or amodiaquine+artesunate [AQ+AS]. Randomisation was on a 1∶2∶2∶2 ratio. Women were admitted for treatment, and followed at days 7, 14, 21, 28 after the start of treatment, at delivery and 6 weeks after delivery to determine adverse events, clinical and parasitological outcomes. Primary outcome was parasitological failure by day 28. Results: 1433 pregnant women were screened, of whom 272 met entry criteria and were randomised; 28 to SP, 81 to CD, 80 to SP+AQ and 83 to AQ+AS. Follow-up to day 28 post treatment was 251/272 (92%), and to 6 weeks following delivery 91%. By day 28 parasitological failure rates were 4/26 (15%, 95%CI 4–35) in the SP, 18/77 (23%, 95%CI 14–34) in the CD, 1/73 (1% 95%CI 7–0.001) in the SP+AQ and 7/75 (9% 95%CI 4–18) in the AQ+AS arms respectively. After correction by molecular markers for reinfection the parasitological failure rates at day 28 were 18% for CD, 1% for SP+AQ and 4.5% for AQ+AS. There were two maternal deaths during the trial. There was no apparent excess of stillbirths or adverse birth outcomes in any arm. Parasitological responses were strikingly better in pregnant women than in children treated with the same drugs at this site. Conclusions: Failure rates with monotherapy were unacceptably high. The two combinations tested were efficacious and appeared safe. It should not be assumed that efficacy in pregnancy is the same as in children.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMutabingwa, T.K., Muze, K., Ord, R., Briceno, M., Greenwood, B.M., Drakeley, C. and Whitty, C.J., 2009. Randomized trial of artesunate+ amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine+ amodiaquine, chlorproguanal-dapsone and SP for malaria in pregnancy in Tanzania. PLos one, 4(4).en_US
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005138
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/327
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLos oneen_US
dc.subjectArtesunate+Amodiaquineen_US
dc.subjectSulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine+Amodiaquineen_US
dc.subjectPregnant womenen_US
dc.titleRandomized trial of artesunate+ amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine+ amodiaquine, chlorproguanal-dapsone and SP for malaria in pregnancy in Tanzania.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Randomized Trial of Artesunate+Amodiaquine,Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine+Amodiaquine,Chlorproguanal-Dapsone and SP for Malaria inPregnancy in Tanzania.pdf
Size:
233.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

Total Collections: 1